Groundery

1 Liberal Man vs 20 MAGA Women (ft. Dean Withers) | Surrounded

YouTube

237 claims analyzed

Shared session

Transcript(237 claims)

I think that we need strong alpha males like Donald J. Trump, Spencer Pratt, and our loved Charlie Kirk >> Did you just ironically say strong alpha males?

>> We have laws in favor of women getting leadership roles. We're taking opportunities away from men. You are oppressed more than me. >> Men are men, and men have testosterone,

and men love beautiful women, and trust me, I would prefer a man that actually looks at women and is sexually attracted to women. >> Dude.

>> They had to make things up to get Trump. Trump doesn't have to be a sexual predator. Any woman would love to be with Trump. >> All right, listen. Put your hand up if

you would have sex with Donald Trump. >> Has Donald Trump been a good president for women, or has America moved backward from expanding women's rights to debating how far those rights should go?

I'm John Regalado and from Jubilee Media, this is Surrounded, where one brave soul faces [music] a room full of disagree-ers. Today, we are diving into what feminism means on both [music]

sides of the aisle, abortion rights, and President Trump's record. I'm here with our [music] featured guest, progressive commentator Dean Withers. Welcome to the show.

>> Thank you for having me. >> You ready to go? >> Oh, I'm excited. This will be fun. >> All right, are you all ready to debate Dean?

>> Yeah! >> [cheering] [applause] >> All right, let's get it to it. >> I'm Dean Withers. I'm a 21-year-old

liberal. I do political debate for a living, and today, I'm surrounded by 20 Trump supporters again. But this time, they're all women. My first Surrounded claim is, men aren't

better at leading than women. >> If you would like to debate this claim, please get to the chair in 3 2 1. >> Good to see you again. >> Welcome back, Lori. How you doing?

>> I'm doing good. How are you? >> I'm doing phenomenal. So, the first claim is that men are not better at leading than women. And I'm honestly appalled that you as a woman would

disagree. But I mean, if you want to start it off by telling us why you do think men are better at leading than women, the mic is all yours. >> Well, how I would like to start this off

is I'd like you to define what a woman is. >> Well, sure. I think that the definition of what a woman is is ultimately irrelevant to this debate and I'm

willing to assume I'm willing to pre-assume your definition of what a woman is, i.e. an adult human female. See, if I were to give you my definition of what a woman is, an adult human

individual that pertains to the social and cultural characteristic typical that of a female sex index to their gender identity, well, then all of a sudden we're going to be speaking past one

another because we define the word woman differently. >> Exactly. So, you're bringing this problem up in the first place is kind of silly because you don't know what a

woman is. >> Well, I just told you what my definition of the word woman is. You just happen to overlook that. >> also depend on what leadership role that

that person would take. For instance, if you wanted Kamala Harris, who you voted for, to be the president of the United States, we have a problem with that and

I'll tell you why. It's not necessarily the woman, but it is necessarily foreign countries, for instance, the Middle East. If I go to a Middle East country as a woman, I can't show my hair at risk

of being stoned. >> we talking about Middle Eastern countries when the prompt is men are not better at leading than men? >> about leading. You voted for Kamala

Harris. I think she would been a horrible leader. Foreign countries don't always see women as respectful as they see a man. A woman leading this country, for instance, when you go to a doing

foreign policy and all of those things, they would not have the respect that a man would. I can also say as a woman, depending on your age, if I've got PMS, honey, I'm going to make different

decisions than I would as if I didn't. If I'm going through menopause, I might have hot flashes or whatever ever else. I believe as a Christian woman, men are supposed to lead. We're supposed to

help. And I'm totally comfortable with that. >> Okay, well, thank you, Lori. So, the first thing that I'll to point out here is that your position that maybe foreign

countries wouldn't respect a female president as much as a male president, I don't think is represented through the fact that on the global stage Harris had a significantly higher approval rating

than Trump during the election. And there's a reason for that. >> Cuz she would have been a pushover. They would have got They would have walked right over her.

>> And that's exactly why she had significantly better policy, better character, and would have been a better president for America. But ultimately, once again, Lori,

>> the topic of debate is not was Harris a better option for the president than Trump because even if we want to look at women and men on this macroscopic level of evaluating one woman compared to one

man, even if it was true Harris was a clown and Trump was awesome, that still wouldn't mean that generally speaking men are better at leading than women. The last point that you made there was

about PMS, and I think that you're like indicating that women are more emotional than men on average. >> They are. 100%. >> me why men commit 92% of violent crimes.

Tell me why they're more likely to self-harm and allowed to commit suicide. So, you think that testosterone is what makes men more emotional? >> Absolutely.

>> Okay, well then you just conceded the debate. >> No, I didn't concede the debate. >> that absolutely men are more emotional than men 5 seconds after saying that

women were more emotional than men. >> and that's kind of like a somewhat of a red herring because what I'm trying to say to you, women are more emotional. They just are in more of a

I can change my mind depending on my mood. Now, you're bringing in anger, you're bringing in violence, you're bringing in >> Is anger an emotion?

>> It is, but to a different extent. And honestly, if you've got a man that's violent, out of character alone, I don't want him leading the country. >> And that's why you voted for

>> Oh, yeah. You want to get into that? I know that's another problem, but I'm happy to get into that. >> we can get into that as well. >> accused. Never accused of

>> Okay, we got to we got to pause there. You've been voted out. Please return to your seat. >> Good to see you. >> Good to see you, Lori. If you would like

to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3 2 1. Welcome. Welcome. >> Hi. >> I'm going to give the mic to you. Why

don't you tell us all why men are better at leading than women? >> Men are better at leading because as a woman, I can tell you that we're emotionally

uh manipulated very easy. We're tend to be compassionate cuz we as a woman and getting pregnant, it's in inherited in us. Why? Because we deal with babies. >> So, women deal with babies, therefore

women can be manipulated. I don't think that that argument follows. >> We're we're we're going to be easily manipulated. >> Women can be easily manipulated.

>> yeah. >> What's the argument for that? >> It's inherited in us. >> Okay, just saying that it's inherent is like me saying that what is actually

inherent of women is that they can't be easily manipulated. That doesn't give me any substance to underpin your position when you just simply underpin your position by saying, "Well, it's

inherent." And it doesn't push this dialogue forward. I would say that men are probably easier to emotionally manipulate than women, or else they wouldn't be culpable for 92% of violent

crimes. We could emotionally manipulate a man by making him lose a game of Fortnite. The next thing we know, there's three holes in his walls. All right, same thing with self-unaliving

statistics, suicide. Suicide's a really bad thing, but it is true that men are significantly more likely to kill themselves than women on average. Same thing with drunk driving, gambling. And

then when we look at women, they actually perform better in the fields that are less indicative of emotional outbursts, such as performing well in school. And I mean, this is all

underpinned by by biology. There was a study done by the American Medical Association that proved that if you're operated on by a female compared to a male in the operating room at a

hospital, that you're less likely to die or to experience any post-negative operative outcomes. Why? Because women are biologically designed to deal with stress and pain better than men because

they have thicker dendrites in their brain. So, ultimately, the science and the empirical facts completely reject the conclusions that you formed. >> Not at all. Men are more rational and

women >> All right, you've been voted out by the majority, so please return to your seat. If you want to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3, 2, 1.

Hi. >> Hi. >> What's your name? >> Annette Davis-Jackson. >> It's a pleasure to meet you.

>> Yes, yes. >> So, uh let's hear it. Why do you think that men are better at leading than women? >> How about I know that men lead better

than women because women have the babies, you're emotional, but more important, I got I have a dad. I have a dad who was very strong and when I see what President Trump is uh embodying, I

say and I know that you can roll your eyes, but you know what? My grandmother used to say, "You can roll your uh cotton balls, but you sure can't shoot them." So, men are strong just like

Trump because in the first day first 100 days, what did he do? He started writing uh executive orders. >> Yeah. >> He started writing executive orders day

after day after day after day after day after day. Women would probably say, "Hey, let me take a break." That's why. >> Jesus Christ. Okay. Well, uh listen, clearly I disagree with you about Trump.

Uh but, that's actually not relevant to my counterargument. I'll tell you why. Because even if Trump was a good leader, that doesn't mean that therefore men are better at leading than women on average.

Like for instance, in the same way that you could give an anecdote of a man that you think is good at leading to justify the claim that men are better at leading than women, well, I could just give an

anecdote of the opposite. Hitler was a man, he was a terrible leader, therefore men are worse at leading than women. All right? But, clearly that's not how it works because we cannot attempt to uh

allow an anecdote of what we think about one individual man to then exist as a portrait for a generalization about all men. >> Why did you have to say Hitler?

>> Because he's obviously a bad leader that's a man. >> Yeah, and and >> The President of the United States, which is the commander-in-chief, Donald

J. Trump, is a great leader. >> Okay. >> And he's a great leader because because he won a landslide. >> Okay.

>> And if he could run again, he would run a landslide again. >> Yeah, yeah. Well, guess what? He's not, he's a terrible president, his policies suck. How about this? What's your

favorite Trump policy? I mean a bill passed through Congress then signed into law. >> I'm a former college coach and not having men and women sports.

>> what bill was that? >> Oh, no. >> Well, I'm sorry, what bill was that? I asked you a very specific question. >> to stop there. You've been voted out by

the majority. Please return to your seat. >> Okay. >> All right. If you want to debate this claim, please get to the center in 3 2

1. Hi Tracy. >> How are you? >> I think I remember you. Were you on my first Surrounded episode?

>> Maybe. >> Well, I'm going to pass the mic to you. Tell us why you think men are better at leading than women. It's uh it's worth me like reminding you and maybe

everybody else in the room that so far a lot of people who've come up and sat in that chair have really missed the mark. Like that last lady. She told me that men are better at leading than women

because she likes Trump. Okay, let's hear in general why men are better at leading than women. >> Well, this is why you're I think you're going to be surprised. I actually agree

with you. >> Then why are you in the chair? >> And I dis- I respectfully disagree with some of them. Well, I'm just saying some of the points that they were bringing up

about a woman being pregnant and because somebody's can carry a baby that they're not fit to lead. I mean, it's the same argument where we say men go to work and come home and the

woman stays and handles the household and the children. So, is that not a powerful position? And I also have to I'm I'm respectfully disagreeing here and I want you to give

me an example if you can tell me hypothetically of a woman that you think would be a better leader than Trump right now. >> So so just to clarify, you don't think

men are better at leading than women. >> No, no, D. Because if I'm in if I'm >> happy I'm really happy that you don't think >> I I I told you I agree with you, right?

>> want you and everybody else in the room to obviously not think that men are better at leading than women, but unfortunately, the nature of this Surrounded episode is where we have

disagree-ers in the hot seat. >> Yes, so I'm asking you. >> you're not though. >> So, if we're going if we're walking down a dark alley, let's say we're on

Figueroa or something, I would be the person having to protect you. I mean, everybody's built differently. I feel like I would have to be protecting you. I'm taller. I I'm

I'm sure I weigh more than you. Uh I mean you can take as many classes as you want. >> Wow. Yeah. >> But it's true, Dean.

>> I'm not Listen. >> Men and women are >> I'm not going to disrespect your ego the same way you're attempting to insult me, and that's fine.

>> No, it's just it's a size comparison. So, it it it depends on where this conversation is going. If you if you're looking at body type that I'm sorry, there are women

that are larger than men. >> vote her out because she doesn't think that men are better at leading than women? >> Tracy, it does sound like you agree on

this prompt. So, we're going to have you return to your seat and and bring in a dis-agreer. >> Okay. >> All right, if you disagree with this

claim and you want to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3 2 1. >> Hi. >> Hello.

>> Your name's Julia? >> Julia Kate. So, I want to ask you inherent in your statement that men are not better leaders than women. >> Yeah.

>> There's the sense that you believe men and women are different, correct? >> I think that there's obviously distinctions between men and women or else we wouldn't have two different

words to refer to >> Okay. So, what are some of the distinctions? >> Well, I mean there's distinctions in the sense of cultural and social attitudes

and behaviors. There's going to be that are of course innate to men and women because I don't think that prescriptive I don't think that prescriptive gender norms exist. Now, like from your

perspective that we were to define the genders on the basis of sex, of course then there's going to be sexual dimorphism and there's going to be differences present within that. Of

course, like there's a plethora of differences. Listen, I'm not denying that there are differences between men and women because once again if there wasn't differences between men and

women, well then we wouldn't have two distinct groups. >> we agree on that. >> My claim is is I don't think that any of the differences that exist between men

and women would amount to being relevant to justify the claim that men are better at leading than women. And I'll actually ask you >> than at leading than men?

>> No, I actually think that gender's completely irrelevant >> Interchangeable is what you're saying. >> of if somebody is better at leading than the other person. I ultimately think

that there's going to be no determinative ability regardless of we're making the claim that men are better at leading than women or women are better at leading than men to ever a

that prescriptive claim. >> hearing is that >> and women are essentially interchangeable in your mind. >> Well, in my mind once again I just don't

believe in the proscriptive gender norms. And I think that ultimately one's gender is irrelevant to their leadership capabilities. If you can tell me what are the relevant differences between men

and women that make men better at leading than women. >> We can go back to the hunter and gatherers when men were the ones going out to hunt and women were the ones

staying with the children and gathering fruits and nuts. Men are the people that go towards risk, that go towards provision naturally. Why is it that in today's even our influencer community,

we have more women that are drawn towards beauty, makeup, things like family, schooling, and men are more drawn towards traditionally masculine things. It's innate in every culture

that you see this trend. We are hormonally different. That's been mentioned throughout this place. You as a man do not know what it's like to have a cycle, to have a period, to have your

hormones go up and down. >> Yeah. >> That is insanely significant for a woman's ability to lead. And women will complain about being scared to walk on

the streets at night and yet they'll elect the same politicians that release the criminals on the street. >> that women should lose the right to vote?

>> I think that we I'm not talking about that today. >> Can you just got to get a quick yes or no then we'll go back to the topic. >> need strong alpha males like Donald J.

Trump, Spencer Pratt, and our loved Charlie Kirk. >> Praise Jesus. >> Have secure borders, who will not let criminals on the street.

>> say strong alpha males? >> Strong alpha males, yeah. >> Bro, get a grip. Stand up. Listen. >> grip. You're a man. Do you want to mansplain to me?

>> Well, I mean actually you just said that men are better at leading than women. So you should listen every word that comes out of my mouth per your perspective, right? So if you think that men are the

strong alpha males and women are the emotional followers, why don't you follow my lead and listen to what I have to say? Because you don't believe what you say.

>> man. I believe that male and female are created equal in the image of God. We each have the same dignity and the same value. We have the same brain, the same rationality, but we have different and

distinct roles. >> Okay. >> Why is it that women can get pregnant? Only females can get pregnant. >> Well, of course that would boil down to

the physical biology that it >> Physical biology suggests that women are more geared towards child rearing and child raising than men are. >> So once again, the way that we started

this conversation was by me agreeing that there going to be differences between men and women. You just simply disagree. Can I finish? I would love it if I could finish. You can't say because

there's a differences between two things that thereby innately one of the two things is going to be better at leading than the other. Like I think that's ridiculous. Listen, once again, my claim

is that the differences that do exist between men and women ultimately don't amount to justifying the claim that men are better at leading than women. Let me respond because you made a lot of

claims. >> You're going on and on. >> I think it's been the opposite. To respond to your claims, you said that there's a difference in the hormonal

balances of men and women that what? Make women more emotional? Well, I mean I already went over this with a >> It's not even just more emotional. It's that our bodies are not equipped to

handle the same levels of cortisol as men. We need more exercise. >> Look at Donald Trump. The man literally lives off of diet coke and McDonald's. >> Okay.

>> We could not do that. >> Okay. Okay. Listen. Actually, women are more equipped than men to deal with stress. It is proven by the science. >> true.

>> No, I'll I'll tell you. You You can look this up. Anybody at home can look this up. Women have thicker dendrites in their brain. And study after study after study has concluded time and time and

time again that this gives women the ability to better manage their stress than men. And you actually brought this up. You brought up childbirth. The reason why women have thicker dendrites

in their brain giving them a greater navigation ability, giving them a greater giving them a greater ability to deal with their pain and stress is because of childbirth, okay?

>> Yes, because childbirth is what makes women better leaders. We need strong leaders. We need strong leaders. We need strong leaders. We need strong leaders. >> Plus once again, when we look in society

how men deal with stress compared to how women deal with stress, well, when a man gets mad, he commits a violent crime. He kills his wife. He kidnaps his children. He sets his house ablaze. And this is

why men are significantly more likely to commit every single crime on the books including crimes that do not have a necessity for any use of physical strength such as arson, cyberbullying,

>> If you think women are such good leaders, why don't you let me speak? >> Well, I'll happily let you speak in response to the things that I've said as long as you're able to stay on topic and

respond to me in the bottom of the box. >> Because I'm a woman and I have a brain. thank you very much. >> Okay, well I guess women are better at leading than men.

>> No, we're not. We're good at arts, certain roles. We have our strengths and our values. We're good at raising children. We're very smart and adaptable, but men are the people that

need to be out there fighting crime for us, protecting us so that we feel safe and we can keep our children safe. Why do you think that just historically more men are CEOs, more men are presidents,

senators, whatever kind of leadership role you want to talk about? That is not because of white supremacy, colonization, or some kind of legal limit.

>> Okay. >> It's because men are drawn to those roles. Today, women have the same exact rights as men and still a lot of them choose to stay at home or feel that they

can't stay at home because of societal pressures. >> Okay. Well, I think that you said it there at the end, societal pressures. Societal pressures are the reason why I

think that we've seen more men in positions of power, more men in leadership fields, and more men calling the shot. But if you're the the position that underpins your claim here would be

that if we see an overrepresentation of men in a field in comparison to women, that men are then by definition better performing in that field. So in the same way you're claiming that because of a

vast majority of leaders are men, therefore women are worse at leading, would you also claim that men are better at surgery than women because 85% of surgeons are men and 15% of surgeons are

women? I just want to direct yes or no to my question so that I can follow this up with a dialogue. >> become surgeons because it's a more masculine thing. It takes more masculine

traits. They have to look at the blood. I said yes, but I want to ask you >> I have to hop in here. >> that men are more oppressed today than women. Men are told that they're toxic

for being masculine. The only laws that prevent any gender from getting a role >> I need to respond. >> We have laws in favor of women getting leadership roles. We're taking

opportunities away from men. We You are oppressed more than me. >> This chick is crazy. Okay, listen. I think that you're crazy because you just said that I'm more oppressed than you

while also claiming that I'm a better leader than you after making the argument that disproportionately men have been in positions of leadership throughout history when leadership is

what grants power. But anyways, insanity. Listen, I asked you a question. I said, do you think that men are better at surgery than women because 85% of surgeons are men and 15% of

surgeons are women. The reason why I asked this question is because you made the claim that men are better at leading than women because a vast majority of leaders have been men. You said yes,

Dean, because a vast majority of surgeons are men, therefore men are better. The science says no, men are actually worse at surgery. So, the American Medical Association did a study

in conjunction with the Journal of the American Medical Association. They did this study on 1.4 million patients over six continents in 14 years, and what they determined consistently is that

when we account for every single confounding variable that could possibly exist, every single time men are significantly more likely to kill a patient on the operating table or to

give them negative postoperative outcomes in comparison to women. It is one of the most well-accredited studies ever conducted in human history that has reasonably concluded that women are

better at surgery than men, even though they account they account for minority of surgeons. And this is exactly what debunks your claim that if a field is overrepresented by men, that therefore

men are better at performing in it. >> and women are naturally drawn to. >> But women are better at surgery, even though they account for minority of surgeons. That completely debunks your

argument. >> Sure, that could be a thing, but I'm saying that naturally men are drawn towards roles of risk and provision. That's because of innate biological

characteristics. >> women are better at surgery. >> said that you're oppressed because of societal society telling you that you need to be a beta, woke man. You are not

like oppressed as a leader. Like instinctually, you want to lead. You want to teach me. That's because of your nature, and I appreciate that very much. But I disagree with your claims.

>> Okay, well, I mean, you have to concede here that your argument that men are better at leading than women because more men are leaders than women is is false. And the

>> Okay, we got to stop there. We're out of time. So, please return to your seat. >> Pleasure. >> [applause]

>> That surrounded episode you watching got you scratching your head again thinking, damn, I've raid baited myself on a Jubilee video again. Well, I got something else that's going to do the

same thing to you or possibly teach you something. You probably seen me before. I'm Austin Hollyoake Broden, and I'm a Christian populist. >> And I'm David Maddix, and I guess I

could call myself a progressive. On this show, we're doing something revolutionary. We're trying to bridge the gap in a uniquely divided America by destroying these echo chambers and

addressing the issues plaguing everyday Americans. Tune in to our show, The Split, Sunday, June 28th on Jubilee. >> My next surrender claim is Donald Trump is a misogynistic sexual predator. Okay,

if you want to debate this claim, please get to the chair in 3 2 1. >> Hello, my name is Shiva Bagheri. >> What's your name? >> Shiva Bagheri.

>> Shiva Bagheri. Well, uh would you like me to take it away by explaining to you why I think Donald Trump is a misogynistic sexual predator? First and foremost, he's a sexual predator because

a court has held him civilly liable for raping a woman by the name of Carroll. Of course, raping somebody is something that would make one a sexual predator. In 2005, he also boasted about engaging

in sexual violence by sexually exploiting beauty pageant contestants at the beauty pageants that he owned by barging into their dressing rooms and looking at their naked bodies. And this

isn't an allegation from some woman that you could defame and say just wants money or fame. No, this was an admittance of guilt, something that Donald Trump said he did on Howard

Stern's radio show. And I see you shaking your head. I'll happily play you the clip if you want. And we also see >> show me the clip because I do not believe it. Yes, take it out.

>> Don't worry, I got it preloaded. >> Okay, good. >> So so you have done that. Now tell >> Well, I'll tell you the funniest is that I go backstage before a show and

everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else and you know, no men are anywhere. And I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm

inspecting it. You know, I'm inspecting I want to make sure that everything is okay. Everything is good. Yeah, the dresses. Everyone okay? You know, that's stated that with no

clothes. Is everybody okay? And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that. >> Why don't we start there? Mike's yours.

>> Okay, well, he said that he probably sees them I it doesn't say they're naked there, so I >> It does. >> They might have No, it doesn't.

>> He said that they have no clothes on. When you have no clothes on, you're naked. >> No, who who said that they didn't have clothes on?

>> Donald Trump. >> He didn't say that in the clip. >> Yeah, I'll show you. >> Okay, again, I want to hear it again. >> Everything is good.

Yeah, the dresses. Everyone okay? You know, that's stated that with no clothes. Is everybody okay? You know >> There you go. Oh well, it's a club like a he didn't actually say clothes, but

>> Yeah, yeah, I >> He said club and >> I I I think it's important for us to be intelligent rational people. You say no clothes. And then Howard Stern says, so

you're like a doctor. >> don't agree with that. Okay, first of all, I don't I don't agree with that. Okay, I don't agree with that. Um but men are men and

men have testosterone and men love beautiful women and trust me, I would prefer a man that actually looks at women and is sexually attracted to women >> Dude.

>> than someone that is not. And I actually like looking at women, too, and I'm not even a lesbian, but I think women's bodies are beautiful. It's like >> Ma'am, I'm sorry. No, no, I'm sorry.

>> This is disgusting. No, and >> You just told me that you would prefer a man who quote unquote likes the female body and is willing to barge into the private

>> that before. I said before that I said before that you're No, I said I don't believe that's right. You just lied about me right now because

I said I don't believe what he did was right by going in there. >> But I would prefer a man who likes to look at the naked bodies of women that got it.

>> been over someone that is attracted to other men. Yes, absolutely. Because it's not natural. >> It's not natural to be gay. >> to be attracted to the opposite sex.

>> Define natural. >> Natural is what God made. Adam and Eve. >> So God didn't make gay people? >> Well, actually No, no, that's sin and sin came from the

devil. >> sin is a conscious decision. Being gay is not a conscious decision. >> Well, actually being gay is a conscious decision. You It's an action. It's an

action. >> choose to be gay? >> Huh, yes, absolutely. I actually couldn't choose to be gay when I was younger.

>> choose to be attracted to your mom? >> to a lot of women actually attracted to me and I said no. And I said no. And I said no. >> If attractions are a choice, could you

choose to be attracted to your mom? >> Huh, can you choose to be a pedophile? >> No, I couldn't choose to be a pedophile. Could you choose to be attracted to your mom?

>> oh, so there you go. He thinks No, it's an action, honey, and you can choose to sin or you can choose not to sin. I I try to keep the devil away from me. >> get a clear answer to the question?

>> this is a clear answer. But see, you don't come from a biblical standpoint. >> What are the first four words of the New Testament? >> I I come from a biblical standpoint that

there's two sexes. There's no 50 different genders. That came from a pedophile named John Money who lied about a study to push reassignment surgery on thousands of people through

his lie that butchered this poor boy and put him through hell. Rimer twins, go look it up on Oprah. Okay? >> I'm going to ask the question again. I'm going to ask the question again.

>> Jesus. >> And a moral is a moral. >> Okay, pause. Pause. Everybody pause. Dean, we got to ask that you don't do personal attacks. That's a warning.

>> Okay. All right. So, first and foremost, the question once again was, could you choose to be attracted to your mother? The reason why I asked why I'm asking you this question is because you had

suggested that all attractions are a choice. So, please with a just a concise yes or no, could you choose to literally be sexually aroused by your mother? So, there's two possible answers to this

question. The first possible answer is yes, Dean, I could choose to be attracted to my own mother. And the second possible answer would be no, Dean, I could not choose to be sexually

aroused by my own mother. >> to do a hook on me. I >> Could I just >> Do you have a yes or no for that? >> No, because this is a hook. Because I

will never be attracted to my mother, my father, because I I it it it's a choice, but I would never do that because I'm a Christian. That's

>> That's it. I'm not going to get say that on camera. That's weird. And I'm not going to be in the hook of this young man that's 21-year-old telling a 52-year-old to put say something

disgusting like that. >> Okay. So, you admit that it's disgusting to think that you could choose to be attracted to your mother. >> We got to stop there. That you've been

voted out by the majority. Please return to your seat. If you want to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3 2 1. Howdy.

>> Hi Dean, how are you? >> I'm doing phenomenal. I'm going to try >> is Zuriel. >> Zuriel, it's a pleasure to meet you. We're going to go back to the prompts. I

think that Donald Trump is a misogynistic sexual predator. The reasons why I think this are some of them that I shared with the last guest. It's because I think that Donald Trump

is a at a civil court determined that he raped a woman by the name of E. Jean Carroll. Uh we listened to that clip of Donald Trump bragging about engaging in sexual violence. Listen, I take a sexual

predator to be somebody that is engaged in sexual violence. Donald Trump bragged about that when he said he'd barge into the dressing rooms of the women at Miss Teen USA and Miss USA. If Donald Trump's

admission of guilt in the clip that I played to the last lady is true, and this is indeed something that Donald Trump has done, then by definition Donald Trump would be a sexual predator,

and thereby by definition I'd be right. >> Can we both agree that people in power of elite, elitist people up there in politics, all have their own maybe their own immoral traits to how why they're

running for candidacy. Like we've heard about Epstein files and there are all these different people that, you know, maybe they're not really here to make a change for us.

>> Yes. >> Can we agree with that? I could care less about what Donald Trump says on the media, cuz I believe as long as he does his very best to be a good president and

do the best for this economy, I don't I don't vote for a president based off oh, their character. I don't I vote for them based off what they can get done, honestly.

>> I would like to just take a moment. Let's look at what you said. Are you saying Dean, it's true Donald Trump is a misogynistic sexual predator, but I could care less because of his policy.

>> What I'm saying is >> Can I just get a straight answer? >> can't deny that maybe he has bad traits of his character. I'm not going to agree that like I don't know everything about

Trump like you do. >> Okay. >> But what I care about is his economy. I don't care about what he has to say >> Let's let's start from the top of this

debate. You sit down. I tell you Donald Trump is a sexual predator. I tell you he's a sexual predator because he raped a woman and boasted about sexually exploiting beauty pageant contestants.

>> why I'm not responding to your question is because I don't know >> Okay, so let's just let's let's test your logic. What do you say? Dean, even if it was true Donald Trump was a sexual

predator because you don't know about the evidence for it, which is something you should look into on your own time. I would still support him as president and could care less. Is that your position?

>> still support him as president because he's does what's best for the economy and for the American dream. >> Yeah. Okay, we got to stop. We got to stop there.

>> You've been voted out. We got to pause there. You wouldn't quote "I would still support Donald Trump as president if he was a sexual predator. If he was a child predator I'd still support him."

>> If you want to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3 2 >> Hi. >> Hi. >> I'm Liz.

>> Nice to meet you, Liz. >> Nice to meet you. >> Listen, I think that you've heard my arguments. You happen to be sitting in a position where you could hear my voice.

Mike is yours. >> Okay, so my question is because you mentioned Donald Trump going into the women's locker rooms, are all trans people sexual predators?

>> So I would not say that trans women are sexual predators for using the women's restroom. I think that the definition of sexual violence would be any sexual act that is done without consent and I don't

think that this would be true of trans women who use a women's restroom. And I have an argument for why I think that trans women should be able to use a women's restroom, but let's try to take

advantage of our time. Instead of me giving you my argument, let's just hopefully stay on topic with the claim that Donald Trump is a sexual predator because he's raped a woman. He has

boasted about sexually exploiting women by barging into their dressing rooms and looking at their naked bodies without consent and telling Howard Stern how much he loved how incredible they

looked. He's mentioned the Epstein files over a million times. >> the young women in sports who do not want biological men in their dressing rooms. Isn't that doesn't that go

against them? >> Well, we can I can I can >> I would love to have a conversation with you about trans people in dressing rooms or sorry, more so locker rooms. And I

understand where you're coming from if you say, "Well, I don't want a trans woman in my dressing room because I would see their naked body and their genitals." And the reason the reason why

I get it the reason why I understand where you're coming from is because even when I go into my gym's locker room and I see other dudes with their dicks out, I'm like, "Hey bro, I don't them to see

me. I don't want them to see see So, I I actually I I advocate I advocate One moment. I advocate for a uni a unisex uni stall one person at one time changing rooms in locker rooms in gyms

and sports across the country. >> is, part of your part of your claim part of your claim part of your claim is that >> Well, you're not Do you accept that Donald Trump is a sexual predator?

>> accuse you of being a sexual predator. >> And if I admitted to doing it, then it would be true. Donald Trump admitted to barging into those dressing rooms, and a court found him guilty of raping

Carroll. >> No, he did No, they didn't, and that's a lie. >> They certainly did. >> No, they didn't.

>> Yes, they did. Listen, do you accept uh that the definition of rape would include the penetration of a woman's vagina with any part of a man's body, including his fingers?

>> Without consent? >> Yeah. So, specifically the action that the jury found Donald Trump guilty for was forcefully penetrating E. Jean Carroll's

>> I think what's going on right now in the world with men and women is that women are accusing a lot of men of rape. And until I see actual proof, because a jury can just agree with anything. That's

That's something else, okay? Until there is actual proof and evidence, and if you can show me the proof that Donald Trump her, then fine. >> Thank you so much for the great

question. What's all the evidence? So, the first form of evidence that we would have would be E. Jean Carroll's testimony, which has maintained consistency for the last 30 years as

corroborated by four friends that testified under penalty of perjury. The second form of evidence that we have >> lied under penalty of perjury. >> Well, can you please like examine the

evidence in which I provide as soon as I'm done providing it? We have therapist notes from the '90s indicating she was by Trump. We have the testimony of a psychotherapist that said when E. Jean

Carroll was testifying to the fact she was by Donald Trump, she was exhibiting signs consistent with true trauma that we'd expect to be onset by a true victim of Then we have Donald Trump's lies and

inconsistencies. He lied. He said that he never met her as a part of his testimony for his defense. And then E. Jean Carroll responded by submitting a photo of them together to the court. We

also have I'm I'm I'm not done with the evidence. I'm not done with the evidence. We have another line inconsistency on Donald Trump's behalf. He also said that he never raped her

because she wasn't his type, but then he confused a picture of E. Jean Carroll to be his ex-wife Marla Maples under deposition. So, clearly she was his type. Then we also have E. Jean

Carroll's dress. E. Jean Carroll submitted a dress to the court claiming it was the dress that she was raped in by Donald Trump. Court confirmed it had male DNA on it, and then when the court

asked Donald Trump to provide a DNA sample to test against the DNA in the dress, he said, "No, no, no, no, no." Doesn't sound like something an innocent man would do. And then the last and

final piece of evidence we have would be his character priors. Listen, we all know that a one-time felon is around 73% more likely to engage in another felony compared to somebody that's never

committed a crime in their life. The same thing rings true about being a sexual predator. So, because Donald Trump has character priors with engaging in sexual predation, like the dressing

room clip, proudly boasting about sexually exploiting naked women and girls, or like the Access Hollywood tape where he literally said that he would just grab women by their vaginas without

asking first, and that's precisely what the jury found him guilty of doing, or everything to do with the Epstein files, that in consideration with the direct evidence submitted by E. Jean Carroll

and his lies, absolutely what demonstrates Donald Trump raping E. Jean Carroll. >> Okay, we got to stop there. We got to stop there. You The flags are up. You've

been voted out. Please return to your seat. If you want to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3 2 1. >> Hi.

>> Hi. >> Nice to meet you. I'm Gina. >> Nice to meet you, too, Gina. >> Thank you. First of all, if Trump was truly a predator, he would have never

reported Epstein to the feds. >> Yeah, he didn't. >> In the '90s. He did. >> Do you mean 2006? >> Yeah, sorry. 2006.

>> It's okay. >> Also, was he ever on the island? >> Well, I don't think that there's any evidence to demonstrate he was on the island. Cuz I don't think he needed to

go to the island to get it off. Listen, about the 2006 uh quote unquote report to the feds about Epstein, he didn't report him to the feds. Epstein got arrested, and then Donald Trump turned

around, called the local sheriff, and said, "Oh, thank God you got him. We've known about what Epstein's been doing all along." Which A indicates that Donald Trump knew what Epstein was doing

with Maxwell and didn't report him to the cops prior to Epstein's original arrest. And B indicates that Donald Trump has been lying to us about the nature of his relationship with Epstein

for the last 10 years. >> No. all heard Donald Trump say that he never knew what Epstein was doing, was never involved, and was completely oblivious. But according to that report

to the sheriff, of course he knew. >> Okay, so first of all, if he did do something, believe me, they would have found it. They had to make the Russian dossier up. They had to make things up

to get Trump. Trump doesn't have to be a sexual predator. Any woman would love to be with Trump. Okay, any woman. >> a husband? >> Um no.

>> Okay. Now wait, well let's actually test that. Can I have all the women with husbands or boyfriends in the room raise their hands? So her claim is that any woman would

love to be with Trump. Would you guys cheat on your husbands and boyfriends with Trump? >> Well, that's a >> Well, we didn't say if they were

married. Not if we were married. >> any Instead of anybody who's in a relationship, is there anybody who would want to be with Trump? >> do let's do the other way around. Okay.

>> predator. Who Okay. All right, listen. Put your hand up if you would have sex with Donald Trump. >> If I was married to Donald Trump, yes. And I'd love to be.

>> [laughter] >> That's crazy. >> Do you prefer Clinton? Why don't we talk about sexual predators as far as Bill Clinton?

>> Why? It's >> Okay, because he's a because he's a predator. >> Okay, and if he is a predator, he's going to be in jail. Okay.

>> Trump did report him to the feds. >> I thought I clarified that's not what happened. >> I'm wrong. Show me that. Give me evidence.

>> Virginia, first of all, Virginia Guthrie worked at Mar-a-Lago in the early 2000s, and he prompted her to come and work for him as a massage therapist. Trump was pissed, and he reported Epstein.

>> Okay, well I would recommend looking at the fact check that will likely be on the video screen that says, "Erm actually, he placed this phone call after Epstein was arrested to thank the

cop and to tip them off about Ghislaine Maxwell." Cuz that's what the fact check is going to say. >> What's the difference? >> Well, the difference is in one scenario,

he's reporting the crime to the cop to then get Epstein arrested. In the secondary scenario, he's thanking the cop after Epstein's arrest, indicating that he knew about what he was doing.

>> I think that in many scenarios what we'll see from co-conspirators of criminals is well once their friend gets arrested for the same crime that they committed will turn around and be all

lovey-dovey to the police to try to like you know indicate and promote the idea they were involved. And the only reason why I bring this up isn't to say I know with certainty that this is exactly what

Trump did but is rather to give plausible doubt to your argument that because he did this we know he's not a sexual predator even though he admitted to it on Howard Stern's radio show and

even though court found him guilty of >> Eight, court never found him guilty of First of all, if he was guilty of he'd be in chains right now. >> how civil courts work.

>> to make Yeah, it is. >> Civil courts don't send people to jail. They They hold people financially liable. That's the nature of our criminal justice system.

>> have been in jail. >> You're not familiar with statute of limitations then. >> I'm familiar with that. >> What's the statute of limitations?

>> You can only um accuse somebody within a matter of time but right now it's 30 years. >> if E. Jean Carroll, okay, came out after the statute of limitations had passed

for sexual abuse in the state of New York against Donald Trump, do you agree that even if she had a video of it happening to her, he wouldn't be in jail because of the statute of limitations

had passed? >> That's not true. There is no statute of limitations when it comes to >> So by the law, okay, the crime that Donald Trump committed per the New York

state legal definition of and of sexual abuse in 2019 through 2022 was was specifically sexual abuse, okay? Because legally speaking in New York, they only define as penile penetration of the

vagina and she testified that he her with his fingers instead of his penis. So because of that it would be legally categorized as sexual abuse and that's the crime that had a statute of

limitations on it. >> insane and they threw the case out just recently. >> Okay, we got to pause there. We got to pause there. You've been voted out.

>> Um I just want to get a real quick raise of hands. This is not to to shame anybody. I'm just genuinely curious. Raise your flag really clearly so we could get a poll if at Donald Trump's

like, you know, when he was in his 40s, if you think he was an attractive man. I just want to get a raise of flags. >> This is so concerning. >> Keep your flag up if you think he is

currently still hot. >> Currently is not. Okay, I I I appreciate it. All right, if you would like to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3 2 1.

>> All right, Lori. Uh Mike and the floor are yours. What are your thoughts about Trump barging into the dressing rooms of the beauty pageant contestants? >> you may not imagine this, but when I was

your age, I was a model. And I can tell you for a fact every fashion show, every modeling call, there are men in the dressing room. There are makeup artists, there are designers.

It's not uncommon. And you're making it as if it's this big huge deal. Donald Trump at the time was the head of the Miss Universe and Miss USA pageant. It wouldn't be surprising if I was in there

changing for him to walk in. And you guys because it Oh, let's look at the camera. He's got a face for that one, too. Let's go to E. Jean Carroll since she already went over this for 20

minutes. >> to that? >> Uh sure, but you we're down to 1 minute. You've already talked about this. >> Trump said that there were no men

anywhere. >> Well, he I don't care what he said. I'm saying as a woman that's been backstage at many, many fashion shows, >> She was the one backstage. She said that

>> Well, I'm sure that there were other men forever or just that instance. I I'm not buying it. Okay, we got 50 seconds. I'm going E. Jean Carroll. E. Jean Carroll, number one, the statute of limitations

had run out. Number two, for a very long time, she never reported it to anyone until Reid Hoffman paid her to freaking go after this lawsuit, and why she is now being charged with

perjury. Not only that, as a celebrity walking into uh Bergdorf Goodman's, you don't think that anybody would have a picture of him? And no offense, I don't trust a

woman that named her cat vagina and freaking said was sexy and charged 21 other men with that crime. >> Lori, you're going to get another fact-check.

>> No, I Well, you go ahead and fact-check. Larry King said rape was sexy. >> you're wrong about Larry King, too. >> Oh, no, I'm not. >> a mess. Okay.

>> Your mind's a mess. >> there's something quite barbaric about MAGA, about this alt-right movement that's hinged on this paraxis of propaganda and useless and futile lies.

And then when anybody tries to check these lies, well, then all of a sudden the provocateurs of this movement get mad, start screaming, start yelling, start saying that they kicked our asses,

and then they don't let us speak. Listen, you made a couple false claims. You claimed that Carroll had said that rape is sexy on an Anderson Cooper interview. That's not what she said. If

you watch the interview with Anderson Cooper, you will hear her say verbatim that what happened to her was not sexual, was not sexy, quote unquote, it just hurt. And then Anderson Cooper

responded to E. Jean Carroll by saying, "Well, I think that most people think of it as like this hurtful, violent thing." And then she responded by saying, "Well, actually, I think most people think of

it as sexy." And the reason why she said that is because we form our own versions of reality predicated on our own experiences. So, when you have the experience of sexual violence, when you

have the experience of sexual violence, >> It was a separate interview. I've been through sexual violence. Have you? Have

>> When you go through the experience of sexual violence, you're more likely to be more hypercritical and aware of crazy people in the world around us that downplay it, legitimize it, or fantasize

about it. So, maybe it was descriptively incorrect. It wasn't true when she said most people think of it as sexy, but regardless of that, that's not her saying that she thinks of it as sexy.

So, stop misinterpreting the genuine claims made by a victim of predicated off of the trauma that they went through. Quite frankly, Lori, I think that is disgusting.

>> Well, I think it's disgusting because I was a victim of actual and abuse. And if you want to compare what happened in the Epstein files, let me just tell you, I was one of those little girls.

>> I'm sorry to hear >> I was one of those little girls, but the guy was Hugh Hefner. So, for you to sit here and sit there and say it's disgusting, I'm sorry, I don't agree

with the woman as a woman who was abused. I don't agree with the attacks falsely on Donald Trump because of the crap that your side always has to push because you got such bad TDS, it's

insane. That woman is a nut job. I knew somebody that worked with her at Simon Schuster said that she was so inappropriate. She also accused 21 other men of the same freaking crime.

>> Name five of them. >> I don't know their names. >> Because they don't exist. We're out of time. We have to pause there. Great job, everybody.

We are currently casting three new episodes of Surrounded. If you're a passionate debater who fits into any of the categories currently on your screen, we'd love to hear from you.

>> [music] >> You can apply through our website jubileemedia.com/casting or click on the link in the description. Feel free to spread the word to friends,

family, or relatives who would be eager to join the circle. If you don't see anything that you're right for, >> [music] >> fill out our open casting application in

our casting team will reach out if you're a fit for future videos. >> My next Surrounded claim is, abortion should be legal. >> If you want to debate this claim, please

get to the center in 3, 2, 1. >> Hello again. >> Welcome back. Mic's yours. I'll let you take it away. >> Okay, well, I have a question for you.

Do you believe in equality? >> Well, I mean, I think that's a very vague question, but generally, of course. >> Okay, so if you do, then all humans are

equal correct? >> Uh no, I don't think that all humans are equal, and I don't think you do either. >> Oh, I absolutely think that all humans have a right to life, liberty, and the

pursuit of happiness. >> Really? >> It's part part of our Bill of Rights. >> Okay. >> And um if you actually love our

Constitution and our Bill of Rights, >> then you would believe what I believe. >> Well, I mean, it says people, but small distinction there. I want to ask you a question. Is it murder for a doctor to

pull the plug on a brain dead patient in the hospital? >> Um some people actually write what they want done. You know, they say, "Hey, if I become brain dead, then pull the

plug." >> Yeah, but for instance, if they don't do that, okay? Like for instance, I haven't done that. If when I leave the set today, I get into a nasty car accident,

I get T-boned by a drunk driver, I go brain dead, okay? Would it be murder for like my family to tell a doctor at the hospital, "Well, because he's brain dead, let's just go ahead and pull the

plug." Would that be murder? >> I honestly, you're talking to someone that is very skeptical of doctors, okay? And even they talk about brain dead people that

weren't actually brain dead. So, I you know, that's why I I always leave up to everything to God. So, when I die is when I die. >> to I want to clarify that.

>> actually don't want to be killed, but now if you're you're on all these machines to keep you alive, if it's months and months and you're not getting better,

>> Yeah. >> um then you're using machines to keep you alive. >> But they're still alive and you still don't think it's murder to kill them.

So, you actually don't think that all humans have this intrinsic right to life. And by the way, that's that's a >> no. You don't speak for me. Again, I just told you I don't believe in

doctors. So, I don't like I don't go to the hospital. >> very That's insane. >> I I I I have not gone to the hospital in a long time.

>> Okay, well, I hope that you you know, I don't I want to add on a point of clarification. >> it's my time. Um now now question for you.

>> All right. >> So, when do you think life begins? >> I think that life begins at the moment of conception. >> Good. I'm glad you believe that.

>> You're Christian and you base your morality off of >> science. >> Christianity. >> it seems like people that are saying,

"We're anti-science." They're anti-science because they don't believe man and woman, they believe genders. >> to ask you a question about abortion. >> Okay.

>> You made the claim that all humans are equal. Every single human has the identical right to life. That is a claim that fundamentally everybody rejects in one way

or >> I didn't say that. So, see, you're putting more into the sentence that I did not add. >> Your opening words were about equality

for everyone. >> liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Now, if you're a murderer, I do believe in capital punishment, but because of your actions.

>> Okay. >> So, I That's where I don't believe in equality is like Is a baby and a murderer the same? No, because a baby's innocent. A civil society protects the

most innocent and vulnerable. They don't go and murder them. That is a satanic society, and I reject it. satanic society. >> Okay, we got to stop there. You've been

voted out. >> Okay. >> If you want to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3, 2, 1. Hi Tish.

>> Hi, nice to meet you. >> Nice to meet you as well. Why should abortion be illegal? >> Well, let me tell you ask you something. Uh abortion is legal here. What What uh

procedure do you prep uh prefer? The suction, the uh the dying uh Yeah. Uh what what what what is it? >> Uh I don't know. I'm the most gruesome holistic gross one where we chop up all

their limbs and throw them in the trash. >> Listen, really, that's gross. That is so gross. >> I know. I'm rage baiting you. Listen, my >> four children

>> But >> set of twins I would never ever do that to my children. Would you Would you have your girlfriend do that to your child?

>> Well, ultimately, I think it's a choice. >> a girlfriend? >> I do. >> Oh, you do? >> Ultimately, I think that it's a choice

of the woman. So, if you want to tell me that you never get an abortion, >> No, I don't know. >> power to you. I I I love that for you because that's your choice, and I think

that's great. But listen, I don't think that abortion is murder because I don't think that there's any trait that we could identify to be true of a fetus in which we fundamentally would value

enough to grant the right to life. The last person on the mic said, "Well, fundamentally, all humans have the same right to life." And that's something that we hear from a lot of pro-lifers.

As I was attempting to communicate to her, everybody rejects that view in one way or another. So, I want to hear your argument in so far as why it's morally wrong for a woman to get an abortion

outside of it's gross >> Because >> Okay, grotesqueness doesn't arbitrate morality. Like, taking a shit's pretty gross. [ __ ] smells like [ __ ] right? But

we're not going to say it's morally wrong to take a [ __ ] even though it's gross. So, what's the argument that abortion is wrong? >> Let me just ask you this. Everyone's

really, really focused on, you know, it's it's it should be the right to for every woman. Why don't you think about it the other way and think about why don't you prevent all these women who

women who don't want to have babies, why aren't you guys helping them prevent pregnancies? >> I I agree we should. >> Yes, we should.

>> 100%. We need access to comprehensive sex ed in schools. We need free and fair access to contra to to contra Yes, of course. >> age?

>> Uh is at at an age-appropriate level. Uh I would say starting in late middle school because like I mean I I was in middle school, you were in middle school, we were all in middle school.

The second thing that I think is also important here uh would be free and fair access to contraceptives. And we should also try to find ways to limit financial instability in young women and young men

because the leading cause of women accessing abortion is financial instability. But you still haven't answered the question and you've been up here for a while. I want to hear why you

think that abortion is wrong. I think that you're struggling to come up with an argument. >> it is murder. >> And the definition of murder would be

the unjust termination of human life. Explain why you think it's unjust. >> First of all, a woman who has a pregnancy, a baby in there, they have they they have the right to life, too.

>> What grants the fetus the right to life? >> What grants it the just that it's been conceived. >> fact that it's a human? >> It is a human.

>> Okay, so brain dead patients have the right to life, too? >> So, what brain dead? >> Yeah, they're human. >> You know what? I've heard of brain dead

people humans coming out of comas. >> Then they're not brain dead. The definition of brain death is irreversible cessation of all cognitive function. Do humans who are biologically

alive because of machines with irreversible cessation of all cognitive function have the right to life? >> I haven't really researched that. So, if there was no hope, possibly.

>> Okay. >> They shouldn't I mean that's not that's and that's not my decision to make. That's a family member's member. >> Okay, okay. So, you think it should be

up to the choice of the family to kill a human that doesn't have the right to life. So, you don't think that all humans have the right to life? >> But if they're brain dead but if they're

brain dead but if they're brain dead, are they really alive? >> Yes, biologically they are. >> You know what? That's a determination that I I would have to take with a

medical doctor. >> Let's say the same thing about women for abortion then. >> No, I don't believe that a woman has that even right that a woman

should be able to get an abortion here in California. >> Yeah. >> No, I don't. >> have to pause there. You've been voted

out. Thanks for your time, Tish. >> Okay, if you want to be the next debater, please get to the center chair in three, two, one.

>> Hi Dean, I'm Anya. >> Nice to meet you. >> Nice to meet you. So, I couldn't hear a lot of what you were kind of saying a while ago, but what were you saying was

brain dead people about if they should be unplugged? >> Well, I brought up a brain dead patient as a counter example to the claim that well, the reason why it's immoral, the

reason why it's murder to kill a fetus is because the fetus is a member of the human species. >> Yes. >> So, our brain dead patients on a

biological level >> should not be unplugged. And I think actually any argument that anyone makes for a brain dead patient to be unplugged is actually coming from the doctors who

want to harvest organs and to promote the organ donation industry culture. And I think that any kind of promotion that even manipulates families into unplugging their brain

dead relatives is also immoral. >> Yeah, I think we agree. We agree on that. >> And so >> So, organ harvesting aside, if a family

wants to unplug a brain dead family member because it's the end of the world >> That's immoral. >> That would be murder? >> Yeah. But I think the doctor it would be

murder from the doctor in the same way that >> So, you truly think it's murder to kill any member of the human species. What about a zygote?

>> That is also murder. >> So, if I kill a unicellular organism, I'm a murderer. Do you think that all murderers should go to jail? >> Human zygotes, it's about humans.

>> So, do you think that all murderers should go to jail? >> All murderers should be put into trial and tried. >> And if but if they're truly murderers,

like that's an uncontestable fact >> Then yeah, they should be put to death. >> They should be put to death? >> I do believe in the death penalty. >> Wow, okay. So, here's the thing.

Do you know what an IUD is? >> Yeah. >> So, an IUD, an intrauterine device, in some circumstances will allow for conception to occur, but then it will

implant or then it will prevent the implantation of the now conceived zygote. >> of the IUD is to prevent implantation. If it leads to death, then

it's not the then it didn't fulfill its purpose. It went beyond that. >> a secondary purpose. So, the main purpose of an IUD would be to prevent conception, but when that fails, the

secondary purpose is to then prevent its implantation. So, if a woman knows that sometimes IUDs will allow for conception to occur, then they kill that conceived zygote, and they still yet choose to be

sexually active, then inevitably they conceive a zygote, and it dies because >> Are you saying that when people have their IUD implanted, it is not for anything beyond just the prevention? Not

It is not done for the murder of any kind of implanted >> Well, because because it's a secondary purpose and function of the IUD, if a woman knows that, then she's agreeing to

the culpability of possibly having her actions yield the death of another person. Okay? And under your view, and hopefully mine, that would be murder given that the person that she's killing

through her actions by secondary order, >> was not the primary purpose of the IUD. >> Well, if I if I buy a gun with a primary purpose of going hunting, but then one day I get really mad, and I use it to

kill my neighbor, okay, I'm still a murderer. >> Um no, the primary purpose of the IUD is to prevent pregnancy. Your primary Your primary purpose is to hunt. Your Your

secondary purpose by that >> example is a car. If I buy a car to get from point A to point B, but then one day I get drunk, and I use it to like wipe out a family

of five, am I a murderer? >> Yes. >> Even though that wasn't the primary function of the car? >> Yes, because you used that car in the

same way that you used the weapon. You used that car to kill someone. >> So, even when it does kill a zygote, under your view, it's murder. >> But even though the primary purpose of

the car is for driving, you used it for anything for something beyond that. It's secondary secondary purpose was not to be driven drunk and kill a >> Well, the secondary purpose of an IUD is

to kill a zygote. But listen, I I think that ultimately the primary or secondary purpose argument is irrelevant, because what we should be evaluating is did a valuable life die, and is a person

culpable for the termination of that valuable life? And if a valuable life died, and a person is culpable for the termination of that valuable life, and it was not justified, then

>> because it was used >> Okay, so I just want to clarify. You don't think in all scenarios when an individual terminates a valuable life unjustifiably so and they are culpable

for said termination that they're a murderer, well then you're just completely redefining what murder even is by introducing the abstract nuance of this quote unquote primary or secondary

purpose argument. >> the one who brought that up. >> At the end of the day, the fact of the matter is in many scenarios women will get an IUD knowing that in many cases

the IUD will lead to the death of a conceived zygote and they will know it will lead to that in many scenarios. Then they will still choose to be sexually active and then the IUD will

kill. Under your view, that would mean that that woman is culpable for murder. Therefore, under your view that woman should be executed. >> You kind of said a lot of stuff. We're

going to pause there. You've been voted out. >> Okay. >> If you would like to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3,

2 1. >> Howdy. >> Hi, Shannon. >> Shannon, Dean. Pleasure to meet you. >> So, I want to know why you think that

killing babies should be legal. >> Of course, because I'm a brutalistic Satanist and I love the DNC and I'm the leader of Antifa. Listen, the reason why I think abortions should be legal is

because I don't think that abortion is morally wrong. I think it's a permissible action. And because I think it's a permissible action, I therefore don't see any good reason to infringe on

a woman's bodily autonomy in the legal prevention of her access to abortion. Therefore, it's a human rights violation. >> So, you don't understand that it's like

killing you don't think it's killing a human being. >> And you're okay with that. >> Yes. >> Okay.

Cuz I don't see any moral reason why not. >> more on preventable measures because you can you don't have to have an abortion. >> Oh, well I also disagree there. I do

think that we should focus on preventable measures. In my optimal society, there's zero abortions, okay? Not because we're forcing women to not get them, but rather because the

conditions in which lead women to get them don't exist such as poverty, financial instability, a lack of sexual education, the failure of contraceptives. In my ideal society,

those things won't exist. >> Do you know that if a woman gets pregnant she's not financially able to keep the baby and she doesn't want the baby, she could at least take Plan B.

>> Yeah. And I And I think that that would be a good fact of sexual education to to share with the world. That Plan B exists. Well, I mean, actually, Plan B is $55. There's off-brand versions that

are 20. And I think that that is a good piece of recommendation. But ultimately, if they don't take a Plan B or whatever like happens after the pregnancy, they should be able to access abortion. Hey,

I want to ask you this question. Do you think that victims of should be able to access abortion? >> No, because they could also take a morning-after pill if they get If I were

to get I would go take a morning-after pill the very next day. >> Wow. So, you think that a victim of would have an obligation to maintain a pregnancy. Is that because that if they

were to like satiate or stop the pregnancy, the fetus would die? Okay, of course it is. So, I want to ask you a question. Do you know who Max Urby is? >> No.

>> So, Max Urby is a 15-14 year-old guy and he's in dire need of a stem cell transplant. And this is a true story. You can look it up. And his his stem cell type is so incredibly rare that his

father set up a like a quote-unquote fundraiser for his son, taking random DNA samples and from people across the globe. So far, they've collected 40 million samples and there hasn't been

one match. What this means is that there's probably only one match alive on the face of planet Earth that could provide stem cells to Max Urby to save his life. So, let's hypothetically

assume that you are the one and only match for Max Urby's stem cell type and the government finds this out. Then the government forces you to provide your stem cells to Max Urby without your

consent for 9 months, introducing many physical and mental complications. Do you think that'd be just? >> No. >> No, because they shouldn't be able to

force you to provide your bodily resources to another life even if not providing your bodily resources would mean that other life dies. That's my position on victims of They shouldn't be

forced to provide domicile in their uterus and access to their bodily resources to the fetus even if stopping the sustenance of those bodily resources to the fetus means the fetus dies. No

different than Max Urby. >> This is a tough one for me cuz I I have mixed feelings about it, obviously, cuz that's a horrible situation to be in. But I do, like I said earlier, morning

after pill. >> Well, could you respond to the argument again? >> have to pause there. You've been voted out. Hey, listen, I appreciate you for

the respectful dialogue. >> By the way, I want to tell you I respect you a lot. I saw you when you cried for Charlie Kirk. You actually have a soul. >> Have a good one.

If you want to be the next debater, please get to the chair in 3 2 1. >> Hello, I'm Georgia. >> Georgia, pleasure to meet you. You said that you work for a pro-life org?

>> Yes, I do. >> Very, very interesting. >> talk about it. >> You guys focus on like preventative means from pregnancy in the first place?

Like do you guys have like policy initiatives to like reduce financial instability or poverty in young women? >> abortion does is it incentivizes people to live in a promiscuous way that

further increases the rates of um pregnancies that are not in a stable situation like marriage. And so, I'm actually against contraception. >> Being pro-contraceptive would save the

lives of more innocent babies under your view because there would maybe less unwanted pregnancies. >> being is always wrong. Abortion kills an innocent human being. Therefore,

abortion is always wrong. >> Yeah, I reject people who >> And allowing abortion just reflects our overall decay as a society when it comes to the way we view sexuality, marriage,

and it just leads to a culture of death. When you have abortion, it leads to things like made in Canada. What abortion is is we're allowing the government to have the authority to

define when personhood begins because we're separating it from the moment of conception. And if it's not at the moment of conception, then the most powerful person gets to decide when it

begins, and that's always subjective. And when more powerful people have that authority or allow themselves out of that authority to define when personhood begins, you have grave travesties like

slavery. If it's a subjective line, then when does that begin? When does personhood begin? And when you say it doesn't begin at conception, it's actually what you're arguing is a very

suspicious mystical idea of when it does and that sounds more superstitious than Christianity. >> Well, thank you for your comments. About your syllogism, I'd reject P1. Don't

think it's always wrong to kill an innocent human being. >> kill an innocent human being, you don't think it's always wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human being.

>> I've said to the last five guests, I mean, we do that to brain dead patients all the time. >> Okay, so that's to withhold care from them. That's sustains their life. That's

different than intentionally going there and killing them. >> Okay, so then you're on board with the abortion pill, withholding the progesterone and supplied through the

umbilical cord that would sustain the life of the fetus. >> I I'm completely against the abortion pill. >> it's just withholding care that would

sustain the fetus's life. >> it's different though in nature because what we're doing is what happens occurs in the uterus is solely for the service of the fetus. The uterus does not exist

to serve the woman. They exist to serve the child. >> Mhm. >> What abortion is is it's just the actual destruction destruction of that child.

It reflects the destruction of our idea of parental duty. Parents have a duty to care for their children. What's your question? >> Uh my question is, let's just like

envision a hypothetical of like a 9-year-old girl getting impregnated and we know that pregnancy is not going to kill her. Per your syllogism that you gave earlier, it seems to be the case

that you'd argue it would be wrong for her to get an abortion. Is this true? >> Abortion only continues to perpetuate violence, the cycle of violence. It only increases the trauma to that child and

what we would do we would still try to minimize the the trauma of pregnancy for that 9-year-old. >> I am completely against abortion in all cases, period. And that's the

>> That's the consistent pro-life stance. >> Wow. >> I >> What about when it's like the life of the mother on the line?

>> Okay, so that's nonsense. What we have is exactly we have C-section. And so >> What if it's before viability? >> That simply does not happen. That simply is a lie of the law.

>> There's no what ifs. Listen. >> I know it's a it's a good question. But by the way, it does absolutely >> it does absolutely happen. >> Okay, our medical technology is so

sophisticated today >> Could you just answer the question like would you be okay with it? >> that there is a black and white the life of the mother. The technology we have

today is where we can we can try we can operate on fetuses and the child can continue >> If a medical health professional determines that a pregnant woman will

die if she doesn't get an emergency C-section or abortion. >> do the emergency emergency C-section, Dean. You just proved my point. >> No, I didn't because it's

before viability. >> Okay, when's viability? Viability is based on technology, not viability changes. >> It It is. I mean I just want to ask my

question. >> One day viability might be in the first trimester. >> The question that I'd like to ask you is let's assume a woman is pregnant. It's

before viability uh per the techno- technological innovations and standards in America cuz that's where we live. >> personhood begin, Dean? >> I'll happily answer your question if you

like. >> abortion be legal? >> So, I think that personhood begins around 20 through 24 weeks with the thalamocortical connections in the fetal

mind, but my question is if there is a woman that's pregnant, it's before viability uh per like the technological innovation in America, and a doctor tells her that she needs to get an

emergency C-section or abortion. It doesn't matter because either way it's going to kill the fetus, and the doctor says if she doesn't get this emergency C-section or abortion, then she's going

to die. Would you be okay with her getting what I just interested. It's a It's It's I want to see where your ideological underpinnings fall. >> So, I notice how that's one of your

debate strategies. You corner us into these questions. I'll answer your question. >> Thank you. >> So, what doctors do is they take an oath

that says do no harm. Doing an abortion not only does obvious harm to the child by killing the child, but it actually does a lot of physical trauma to the mother. It does a lot of trauma to the

uterus. And not only that, but many women end up being suicidal after abortion. But regardless of that, >> answer the question though? >> very backwards view of the technology

that we have now. There simply are not cases where women need to get abortions >> Notice how she's not answering the question. >> because it's not a scenario that

actually exists. A lot of these doctors are committing medical malpractice, and they're actually lying because they have an agenda. >> They don't even If it were to happen,

would you be okay with that woman getting an abortion? >> Absolutely not, because that doesn't happen. >> So, if it did, you wouldn't be okay with

her getting an abortion? That's insane. >> does, see we're talking about >> going to pause there. We've got to pause there. We're kind of at an impasse. Um we've also run out of time, so we're

going to move on. My next surrounded claim is, Donald Trump is a terrible president. >> All right. If you want to debate this claim, get to the chair in 3 2 1.

>> Hi. >> Hi, welcome back. >> Yeah. >> I don't know, let's see. Donald Trump is a terrible president because he slept

his way to the top. >> No, I actually think that >> Remember that? It was brutal. Hey, listen. Floor's yours. Why do you support Trump?

>> I think that he has done a He's obviously done a lot of things. I can't say he's a perfect person, but I do think he has done things to benefit us. >> What is one macroeconomic indicator

that's better off today than it was a year and a half ago under Biden? >> Closing the borders. >> So, that's not a macroeconomic indicator. A macroeconomic indicator

would be something like GDP growth, unemployment, inflation, jobs reports, uh and by definition, a macroeconomic indicator is just simply a gauge that we could use to determine the health of the

economy overall. So, once again, speaking about GDP growth, inflation, like wages, so on and so forth. >> if I can I can dive into that? >> One indicator that's better off today

than it was a year and a half ago under Biden. >> Um the amount of drug use and fentanyl in society has gone down miraculously because he has closed the border, and

illegal drugs are no longer allowed to come in. >> Do you understand the question I'm asking you? >> Yeah, I do, and I'm answering it.

>> So, the amount of people that use drugs in society could of course influence macroeconomic variables. Like, if everybody was drugged up all the time, nobody could go to work, right? So,

therefore, the macroeconomic indicator of like unemployment would be really high. Okay? So, it's not directly the macroeconomic indicator, but rather it's an influence of the indicators. So,

directly, what is one macroeconomic indicator that's better off today than it was a year and a half ago? Keep it in mind that macroeconomic indicators are things like inflation, GDP growth, wage

growth, real median wages, uh unemployment, job reports, so on and so forth. >> Same thing. I'm going to go with drug use.

>> Stop it, dude. >> Okay. >> Dude. >> Listen. So what macroeconomic indicators does drug use influence? Are you saying

that now we have like a lower level of unemployment because of that? >> by closing the border and not allowing illegal people in here giving me and so many other people job opportunities that

they weren't allowed to have before because companies were employing illegal immigrants just like the weed farm in California that Newsom was directly supporting. They had children at the age

of 9 years old illegally here working for them. Those people are no longer allowed here giving the job opportunities to others. That is benefiting the economy.

>> Okay. So is that why we added the lowest amount of jobs to the economy in 20 years ignoring recessions last year under Trump? Is that why we have the highest level of unemployment since the

pandemic? Yeah, it's not. The reason why mass deportation The reason why mass deportation doesn't open up job opportunity in America is

very simple. Because ultimately undocumented immigrants as a demographic are very economically productive. They pay over a hundred billion dollars in taxes per year at the federal, state,

and local level. And they pay in 1.1 through 1.7 trillion dollars to the GDP annually. And according So that's So my source is the IRS. Do you think

the IRS is lying? >> Absolutely. I'm sure I'm sure they can lie about statistics all the time. >> So Donald Trump's IRS is lying about how much

>> Trump's IRS. >> Well, that's what the IRS is saying today. Who's the president? >> No. Well, this is the The statistics came in from years ago. You've used that

since the last time we were here. >> Do you know who Scott Brison is? >> No. >> He's the administrator of the IRS. Do you know who he was appointed by?

>> Donald Trump, I'm going to assume. >> And Scott Brison and the IRS under Trump still report that. And listen, it's it's it's not a contestable fact. >> population can't allow opportunities for

others to come in. You realize I have I have I have >> Because it makes the economy >> family that are refused opportunities, health care, and other resources due to

the fact that it's oversaturated by people do who do not have a citizenship here. And by closing those borders and not allowing those people to come in, it gives them the space to have that

because that's what my tax dollars should be paying for. >> that undocumented immigrants can access like federal Medicaid, Medicare, or something like

>> actually. They can't. >> Do you Do you know what the Personal Work Order and Responsibility Act is? >> I I actually know that they can because I have family members that perfectly

walk in and they can get checks month per month, living month per month, and we support that. Our tax dollars that we pay, we support that. >> a yes or no? Do you know what the

Personal Work Order and Responsibility Act is? >> I believe it has something to do with jobs and paying taxes no matter your >> No. The Personal Work Order and

Responsibility Act is a bill from the '90s that strictly limits and prohibits any type of federal public welfare benefit from being given to

>> the law, obviously. Here in California, we >> undocumented I'm going to continue to speak. There was one slight addendum to this with Obama's I'm Tall of which just

says that undocumented immigrants can get life-saving emergency care if they need it. But, the point is, when you suggest that undocumented immigrants are relying on these federal systems of

benefit >> are. >> anyway from Medicaid to Medicare to to Section 8 to food stamps, they're not. It is literally illegal for them to

collect those benefits. >> And they do anyway because states like California allow it. We pay for it. I believe No, I'm not confused. >> confused about is the difference between

limited state-level benefits and federal benefits. So, you're right. >> But, it still happens on some level. Can you acknowledge that? >> In 10 of our 50 states, undocumented

immigrants have the limited ability to collect social safety net >> still an ability and my tax dollars in California are paying for it. Yes. >> Well, actually their tax dollars pay for

it because they pay $100 billion per year in taxes. That's what I told you. >> And people people like my brother with disability that truly need those things are being cut

>> different systems. >> Absolutely not. >> Yeah, they are. >> Nope. >> What's Medi-Cal?

>> Medi-Cal? My brother gets Medi-Cal and they also get Medi-Cal. Yes, they do. >> of benefit for undocumented immigrants that no longer exists. >> My brother literally just got something

in the mail that says for Medi-Cal. >> Your brother's on Medicaid on the state level. >> Medicaid. >> Listen, I The point that I'm trying to

make here >> I'm filing for a conservatorship for my brother. I would know exactly what he gets. And he's getting cut by day because of the over saturation and the

over population of people we don't even know exist and we're not paying for them. So, do we not acknowledge that by closing the borders like I'm going to go back to my point just like you like to

do with everybody else? I'm going to go back to my point that by cutting that population off and allowing more space for opportunity for Americans would benefit the economy.

>> So, you're saying that you pay for the benefits of undocumented immigrants when they're paying over a hundred billion dollars per year in taxes in the federal, state, and local level. Uh

well, guess what? They're paying for their own benefits in the ten limited states that give them. In fact, >> do their jobs. >> this is this is just

anti-intellectualist propaganda. That's what the IRS says. That's what the Cato Institute which is run by libertarians which is right leaning society. >> Okay, well, let's pause there. Let's

pause there. You've been voted out. >> Hater. >> All right, if you want to be the next debater, get to the chair in three, two, one.

>> Hi, nice to meet you. >> Hi, ma'am. It's nice to meet you. >> you, too. I want to talk to you about my point of view as a Mexican American Jewish.

I'm not saying Trump is perfect, but I'm saying this the reason I vote for him and I would vote again. First of all, I want to touch the point that she said about borders but not about the people.

I'm talking about the drugs and the traffic that is coming from my country and it's from from my government because Mexico has a narco government. You know who's the only one who has the guts to

go right now and deal with the president? Trump because the other administration didn't do it. >> Yeah.

>> Who went to bring Venezuela Maduro to the jail? Trump. And this is affecting United States. >> Yeah.

>> I mean, I'm not saying everything he's doing is great and I'm Jewish so I support Israel. Who is the only one who's supporting Israel? Trump. Otherwise, I don't know how we're going

to be right now. >> Oh, yeah. Let's let's support a state that's committing genocide and ethnic cleansing in Australia.

And Lebanon. And let's make sure to throw one billion dollars a day at a war that's killed thirteen of our servicemen and women for another state per the testimony of Joe Kent. Listen, okay,

there's my point. I want to respond I want to respond to the first claim. >> is the first ally of United States. So, we have the right to [clears throat] support Israel. And you know what? God

said to Abraham, I will bless whoever bless you and I will curse whoever whoever curse you. If you want to be blessed in this country need to be blessed needs to bless Israel first.

>> Yeah. You be the prophet. >> has been every single country who has been cursed Israel is Look how they are right now. Do you know that?

>> It's not religious. >> It's genuinely religious psychosis. >> Do you see how Chavez ended? He cursed Israel from the from his death and he said it from his and

he's dead. >> Yeah, we have to bless the ethnic the ethnic expansionist genocidal terroristic state or else we're all going to be cursed and die. I want to

respond to the first couple claims that you made specifically on topic with Venezuela and the border. So, who brings in 70 to 80% of the drugs into this country per the homeland of

homeland of border security? >> Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela. Who is bringing them? Who is supporting them? It's Mexican country and I'm sorry to say it. I love my country, but my

government is >> Okay. >> disgusting >> Thank you for your response. So, 70% of the drugs sold in America brought into

America are brought in by citizens. Why do I bring this up? Because when we say the undocumented immigrants are the issue, they're the people that are just bringing all these drugs across the

border then they come here to like women and kidnap children and commit all these heinous violent crimes is nothing more than demoni- is the demonization of a demographic that's actually very

beneficial >> Documented people are the one who bringing to become citizens. >> And that's why you shouldn't support

Trump. >> I'm not telling you he's doing everything perfect. I never said that. I'm talking about the borders that he we have more than 2,000

miles border with Mexico and that's where they come drugs and that's where they come this trafficking >> Listen, I don't through legal ports of entry for the

most part. >> They are killing our people in the streets right now. >> once Once a vast majority of the drugs uh drugs brought across the border are

brought in by citizens through legal ports of entry. And it it when when I give you an explanation for this, it's going to make sense to you because think about it. Okay, when a citizen is coming

in through a legal port of entry, okay, well, nobody just has the innate right per the state to pull them over, scrutinize them, check every uh you know, nook and cranny of their vehicle

because of our Constitution. But when, you know, they identify an undocumented immigrant, well, they already have uh an individual who's capable of breaking federal law, so then they have all the

rights in the world to detain them and arrest them if they need to pat them down or check their vehicle. And that's why a lot of the drugs that come into this country will come in with citizens.

But I think my larger point here is I don't think that Donald Trump has secured the border. I think that the reason why we've seen such a drastic decline in undocumented entry has

nothing to do with proactive long-term border policy, but rather to do with fascism and human rights abuse. There are people in this country that are getting illegally deported and then

tortured in places like Secot. Executive Order number 13160 attempted to unconstitutionally reclassify citizens as undocumented immigrants to be lined up and deported by the DHS. We're we're

watching people like Alex Fredrickson get murdered in broad daylight by ICE agents. >> to answer to you before you continue. You're talking about legal

interpretation. I I used to be a foster care liaison. When all these kids in cages, that was not true. I was there. They called us for an emergency meeting looking for families to support these

kids meanwhile they were reunificated with their families. Reuni- reunification with their families. Yes, it was not true they were in cages. That was just the media what they wanted to

portray. >> So, your argument that Executive Order number 13160 doesn't even exist? >> What I'm saying is the media wants to say what they want to say because they

have already, you know, >> But this isn't coming from the media. It's coming from the White House website. >> All right. All right, if you want to be

the next debater, please get to the chair in 3 2 1. >> Hi, welcome in. Um I think we should start this off a little bit. >> even sit down.

>> I know, I'm talking to you while you're standing up. Hi, I got Okay, I'll slow it down. What's your name? >> I'm Katia, but you can say Tia. It's a lot easier.

>> Well, it's a pleasure to meet you, Tia. Thank you for being here. Listen, I say we start this conversation off a little bit differently. Can I tell you why I think Trump is a terrible president?

>> That's what I was going to ask you. I would love to know, actually. >> Perfect. Well, I break it down into the three main categories. There's domestic policy, his foreign policy, and his

character. Okay? He is the worst president of my life, the worst president of your life, and the worst president of the lives of every single person sitting in this circle. Let's

start by evaluating his character. He's a 34-count felon, a adjudicated rapist that has posted about perving on the naked bodies of beauty pageant contestants, depicted black people as

monkeys on his Truth Social, and was sued in the '70s for refusing to rent to black people because he thought that they were {quote} poor. And there's about a billion other things I could say

because of the time on the clock, I'll keep it concise. We look at his domestic policy. There's not a single macroeconomic variable that is better off today under Trump than it was a year

and a half ago under Biden. GDP growth is down. We got one of the worst jobs report in modern American history last year, adding only 170,000 jobs to the economy after adding 2.2 million under

Biden in 2024. We see that unemployment is up. We saw 1.3 million layoffs. We see the highest increase in the price of gas in 1 month since the Vietnam War in 1967. Foreign policy is a disaster. He

said he was going to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine on day one, he didn't. He said he was going to bring us closer to our allies, now they all hate us because we imposed unconstitutional

legal tariffs on them. He said he was going to be the president of no new wars, then he started a new war of choice in Iran just to deflect away from the Epstein files. And this holistic is

why I think that Donald Trump is a terrible president. The mic and the floor are yours. >> Okay, thank you. Um so I haven't been in politics that long as

far as like interest. It was like 2016 really opened my eyes. I never thought Trump had a chance, honestly. But I do seem to remember in 2016 a lot of the dialogue around his win was he only won

because America's racist. Basically saying everyone who voted for him was racist. This is after eight years of Obama, by the way, who got reelected. So, based on that and after four years

of not being president and now he's back, why do you think that he won if he's one of the most terrible presidents in our lifetime? >> Okay. Yeah, I'll give a direct answer to

that question. I first want to ask you a clarifying one. Do you think that Biden was a bad president? >> I don't want to talk about Biden cuz that's not why we're here.

>> Right. Okay. Well, I'd expect you to answer that question to be no, of course, but Biden got the most votes out of any president in history. We can't say just because people were willing to

vote for a candidate to be president that therefore they were the best option. The reason why I think that Trump won the election had a lot to do with propaganda surrounding the negative

economic impacts of the pandemic, okay? We saw 9% high levels of inflation, roaring gas prices, and I don't think that these things were caused by Biden, but Biden never was really too publicly

outspoken about that. And I think that was a messaging problem with the Dems. The second reason why I think that Donald Trump won had to do with the fact that Kamala Harris only had a little bit

over 100 days to run, which I also blame blame on Biden. He should have stepped down a lot sooner. But ultimately, I don't think Trump won because he's a good president, and that's undeniable.

Has your life gotten better in the last year and a half? >> My life has gotten better, actually. >> made it better? Tell me specifically. >> I I honestly do feel safer with him

president. I mean, we can beat a dead horse with the with the closed border. That means a lot to me. Like, I'm a mom. I have kids. It's important to me that and I live in LA, which is like crazy,

right? Do you live out here or no? >> No, I don't. But you would be safer to leave your children with the average undocumented immigrant compared to the average citizen. They're 2.5 times less

likely to commit violent crimes compared to the average US citizen. >> I home school and that's why I'm a I'm a mom. And my children come first. So, for me, being able to do that is a blessing.

There's a lot of sacrifices that come with that, especially in this economy. I would be lying if I didn't say like it's difficult with the gas prices. It's difficult with the groceries and the

tariffs. There's a lot of things. Yeah, similar with Biden there was a lot. Inflation has not increased any uh same amount as it did under Biden. So, the money to Ukraine and the open border.

You can look and you can research about how much it cost us to send the amount of money that we did to Ukraine and what it did to affect our economy and also with the undocumented immigrants. They

are getting medical. They were getting money for the Similar with Biden, there was a lot. Inflation has not increased any uh same

amount as it did under Biden. So, >> Biden do to cause it? >> The money to Ukraine and the open border. You can look and you can research about

how much it cost us to send the amount of money that we did to Ukraine and what >> money did we send to Ukraine >> what it did to affect our economy. And also with the undocumented immigrants,

they are getting medical. >> They were getting money for food and free housing. >> How much money did we send to Ukraine in 4 years under Biden?

>> You tell me. >> $220 billion approximately. >> Okay. >> Now, here's a thing. If you're going to blame Biden's 9% high level of inflation

on $220 billion spent over the course of 4 years, then why don't we see like 50% levels of inflation considering the fact that in the last last year and a half Donald Trump has passed the big

beautiful bill, which according to most estimates it will is clocked in the cost us around 3.4 trillion dollars over the course of 10 years. Or the simple fact that he's spending a billion dollars a

day on a war in Iran. He's going to send just as much money or spend just as much money on this war in Iran as Biden did in 4 years on Ukraine in less than a year. And on top of that the cherry is

Donald Trump has continued to fund Ukraine. Blaming a 9% high level of inflation on $220 billion worth of expenditures nuts, especially when we consider that the Biden-Harris

administration spent half of what the Trump administration spent in their first term. >> I get what you're saying and I think both of us at the end of the day we want

what's best for America. I think we have different plans or strategies to get there. But the main thing I did want to come up here and say, I don't think you really answered it was if Trump was the

worst president in our lifetime, how did he win twice, if not three times, depending on who you talk to? Exactly. So, if he was that terrible, either were the and I mean you can say are we dumb

as a box of rocks? Like are we the stupidest people? I've been told I'm internalized racism and internalized misogyny. I would love for you to be honest.

>> I don't think that anybody in the circles particularly intelligent. >> Okay. And I understand that that's how people see us. >> Yeah, we're going to stop we're going to

stop there. You've been voted out. Thank you. Return to your seat. >> Well, thank you for your time. >> Thank you for your time, Tia. >> If you want to be the next debater, get

to the chair in three, two, one. >> Hi. >> Hi. >> My name is Leia. >> Nice to meet you.

>> Nice to meet you, too. Um just a little background, I am currently active duty in the United States Marine Corps. I'm not here on >> Be careful, hot takes.

>> I'm not here on behalf of the Department of War, by the way. I also grew up in Jerusalem, Israel. And I think that Trump has done a lot for me personally, and I feel like that's what we should

all be here speaking about to an extent. Um I've gotten paid more under him. I've gotten bonuses under him. Um the military has tightened up under him. And from that perspective, I he's my

commander-in-chief, and I I'm grateful for that. >> Um yeah, out of everybody sitting in this circle, you have the most reason to not support Trump. Could I tell you why?

>> love to know why. >> Cuz you're an oath. You took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies overseas and domestic, correct? >> Correct.

>> Can we agree that an enemy to the Constitution, domestic or foreign, would be a person who thinks that the Constitution should be terminated, is intentionally and belligerently

infringing upon it? >> Can you go in depth with that, please? >> Well, I mean, I think that is all the context that would be required to understand an enemy. If there's somebody

that is intentionally and belligerently infringing on the Constitution, has suggested that maybe we should terminate it before, can we agree that person would be an enemy to the Constitution?

>> That would be an enemy. I I do agree with you, but I don't